On Friday, federal prosecutors instantaneous that the US Department of Justice brush off all three charges in opposition to MIT nanotechnology professor Gang Chen, ending a two-year ordeal stemming from accusations that he hid funding from Chinese entities on grant disclosure kinds. 

Chen had pleaded no longer guilty to all charges, whereas his employer had indicated that the funding in expect was as soon as for the college, relatively than for Chen for my fragment. MIT is paying his honest fees. The college declined to touch upon a pending courtroom case. (MIT Skills Overview is funded by MIT, however is editorially neutral.) 

Chen was as soon as one amongst the most outstanding scientists charged below the China Initiative, a federal effort launched in 2018 to counter financial espionage and nationwide safety threats from the Other folks’s Republic of China. Despite these goals, an investigation by MIT Skills Overview stumbled on that the China Initiative has increasingly extra obsessed on “evaluation integrity” violations, treasure Chen’s, relatively than on commerce-secret theft. 

The movement to brush off has yet to be filed, and final approval for dismissal rests with the raise. If the movement is authorized, Chen’s stands out as the eighth evaluation integrity case to be brushed aside forward of trial, in accordance with MIT Skills Overview’s database of conditions. An additional evaluation integrity case, brought in opposition to University of Knoxville nanotechnologist Anming Hu, ended first in a mistrial and then a beefy acquittal. The only China Initiative evaluation integrity case that has been efficiently tried in entrance of a jury is that of Charles Lieber, who was as soon as stumbled on guilty of six charges of mistaken statements and tax fraud closing month. (Survey all evaluation integrity conditions here.)

Analysis integrity conditions center on college students and teachers who were accused of failing to completely inform relationships with Chinese entities, basically on grant or visa kinds.

Public accusation

Chen’s complications started in January 2020, as he was as soon as returning to the usa from a college-backed day commute to China with other MIT college and college students. Detained and wondered at Boston Logan International Airport, he was as soon as launched after his phone and computer were confiscated. 

A year later, Chen was as soon as arrested on suspicion of federal grant fraud and publicly accused of disloyalty to the US—a charge each and each so recurrently leveled in espionage conditions, no longer grant fraud, as Chen’s defense group of workers identified in its strive to formally sanction the US Attorney’s Space of labor for the assertion. Chen was as soon as within the demolish charged with three counts of wire fraud, mistaken statements, and failure to file a report on a international checking account. 

Nevertheless the coronary heart of the case was as soon as whether or no longer the nanotechnologist had disclosed contracts, appointments, and awards from entities within the Other folks’s Republic of China, including a Chinese talent program, and extra than $19 million in funding from the Chinese government, whereas receiving federal grant funding from the Department of Energy. 

That expect grew to become less predominant when a Department of Energy official confirmed that grant requirements in 2017, when Chen submitted his application, had no longer stipulated that he must inform posts in China, however that disclosure set apart no longer comprise affected his grants, because the Wall Road Journal first reported.

The cash at the center piece of the fraud allegations—$25 million—was as soon as intended for MIT to bolster a brand fresh collaborative evaluation center at China’s Southern University of Science and Skills, relatively than Chen in my knowing. “Whereas Professor Chen is its inaugural MIT college director, here’s no longer a particular person collaboration; it’s a departmental one, supported by the Institute,” MIT president Rafael Reif defined in a letter to the MIT neighborhood closing year.

Chen’s case got popular consideration because he is one amongst the most outstanding scientists charged below the initiative. MIT college contributors wrote an delivery letter supporting the student that furthermore reflected the broader concerns of the educational neighborhood in regards to the criminalization of frequent tutorial task. “In many respects, the grievance in opposition to Gang Chen is a grievance in opposition to all of us, an affront to any citizen who values science and the scientific endeavor,” they wrote. 

What next?

With the charges in opposition to Chen all however certain to be brushed aside, six extra evaluation integrity conditions dwell pending. Four are scheduled to switch to trial this spring. Meanwhile, an rising decision of disparate critics, including scientific associations, civil rights organizations, lawmakers, and even aged officials obsessed on shaping this system, were calling for an end to this system, or no longer lower than to its concentrated on of teachers. 

The Justice Department is “reviewing our solution to countering threats posed by the PRC government,” department spokesman Wyn Hornbuckle told MIT Skills Overview in an email. “We dwell up for finishing the evaluation and providing extra info within the approaching weeks.” He referred questions about Chen’s case to the US Attorney’s Space of labor in Boston, which has no longer yet responded to a expect for comment.

Meanwhile, on January 4 the White Condominium Space of labor of Science and Skills Protection printed updated steering on strengthening protections for American evaluation and grace in opposition to international interference, which included extra tiny print on disclosure requirements for major investigators.

As for Chen, “he is asking forward to resolving the prison topic as soon as possible,” his authorized dependable, Robert Fisher, told MIT Skills Overview.

Extra reporting by Jess Aloe. 

Read More


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here